comments edit

I started off planning to write a quick installer for a little something I’m working on. Unhappy with the limited abilities of Visual Studio’s Setup and Deployment project, I finally started playing with WiX.

After a good deal of time reading through the documentation, I have a pretty good handle on it. However, it’s difficult to apply the WiX philosophy (build your setup project as you go along) to an existing project that already has several hundred files.

Along comes Tallow to the rescue (part of the WiX toolkit) which can generate a fragment containing components themselves containing references to your files. Sweet! But now you have to reference all the generated components within your Feature element.

So that drags me further into the hole where I’m performing minor surgery on the Tallow source code. I soon discover a list of other feature requests (auto-generate Guids, etc…) and I soon catch myself. Hey, I’m just here to build a setup project, not rewrite the whole damn setup toolkit.

So I now have a customized version of Tallow.exe that will generate Guids for components. It will also generate a commented section of ComponentRef statements like so.

<!–\ <ComponentRef Id=’component0’ /<\ <ComponentRef Id=’component1’ />\ <ComponentRef Id=’component2’ />\ –>

You can manually (eww!) cut and paste that section into your main .wxs file in order to reference all the components in the generated fragment.

Now back to my initial task…

[Listening to: Daydream - Privilege - A Trip In Trance (CD 2) (3:45)]

comments edit

You’ve heard CSS purists beat it into you over and over again that “Tables are bad, umkaaay?”. But man, what a pain when you’re trying to do something as simple as a web form and you want the labels to align to the right and the controls to align to the left.

So Dimitri here rides in to the rescue with TILT (Table Injection for Layout Technique). He showed this to me a few weeks ago and has finally polished it to the point that he’s ready to tell the world.

Essentially, this technique allows you to mark up your code semantically like the CSS purist you are, but then with some crafty usage of Javascript, modify the DOM and inject a TABLE (with all the benefits therein). Genius.

comments edit

The Corporation I know I’m late to the game, but since I rely on Netflix, I’m always watching movies long after the general population has seen them. However, we just finished watching the documentary “The Corporation” and I couldn’t recommend it more if you haven’t seen it already.

Even if you’re a tried and true Capitalist (like I am), it’s worth watching as it does a pretty good job of raising questions about how we define wealth and corporate responsibility among other things.

It certainly provides insight into the question of whether corporations should act purely on self interest. Corporations should definitely be responsible to their shareholders, but perhaps also to their stake holders. If a corporation is owned by people in the U.S., but pollutes the air in Chile, it’s being responsible to its share holders, but what about the stake holders?

In the end, I think the big take away from the documentary is that for corporations to be truly responsible to shareholders, they must redefine what it means to provide “value” to shareholders. Value is more than immediate cash profit. Value is also provided via sustainability. Clean air is valuable. Clean water is value.

A second take away is that when our news agencies are in the pockets of big corporations, how will people get the truth so they can make more rational decisions about policy regarding the environment and corporations? That’s a real disheartening topic.

Well not one to underestimate human nature, it leaves me with the big question of how do you make it profitable for companies to be sustainable? That’s certainly one way to enact change. But it has to be done in such a way that it is inherently profitable to be sustainable. Enacting policies might just make corporations leave U.S. soil. One approach is to wait till the environment has been plundered so much that there’s no other way. I’d prefer we not wait so long.

comments edit

A while ago Patrick Cauldwell highlighted a wonderful technique of using embedded resources for unit testing with external files.

Fully on board with Pat, I’ve applied that technique to client script blocks when building web controls and ASP.NET pages.

How often have you written (or had to deal with) crap like this.

string script = "<script language=\"javascript\">"
  + "function SomeFunction(someParam)" + Environment.NewLine
  + "{" + Environment.NewLine
  + "    alert(’Man, this sucks!’);" + Environment.NewLine
  + "}" + Environment.NewLine
  + "</script>";

A preferred approach is to have your client script code in a separate file. For web controls, I generally have a folder named Resources that contains a folder named Scripts. I’ll add my client script files there as embedded resources. In figure 1 below, you can see that I have two script files in my project.

Embedded Scripts\ Figure 1 Script files.

To make sure these files are compiled as embedded resources, I select the files and set the build action to embedded resource in the Properties window as in figure 2.

Embedded Resource \ Figure 2 Build Action = Embedded Resource.

Now when I need to display these scripts in a page, I can use the following code which makes use of my handy dandy ScriptHelper class.

  string script = ScriptHelper.UnpackScript("PairedDropDown.js");
  Page.RegisterClientScriptBlock("PairedDropDownHandler", script);

The contents of my embedded script files do not contain the <script> tags. I leave that responsibility to my ScriptHelper class so that these script files can be used as stand alone script files as well. The code for my script helper class is below.

/// <summary>
/// Utility class for extracting embedded scripts.
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// Uses a naming convention. All scripts should be placed 
/// in the Resources\Scripts folder. The scriptName is just 
/// the filename of the script.
/// </remarks>
public static class ScriptHelper
  /// <summary>
  /// Returns the contents of the embedded script as
  /// a stringwrapped with the start / end script tags.
  /// </summary>
  /// <param name="scriptName">FileName of the script.</param>
  /// <returns>Contents of the script.</returns>
  public static string UnpackScript(string scriptName)
    string language = "javascript";
    string extension = Path.GetExtension(scriptName);
    if(0 == string.Compare(extension, ".vbs", true
      , CultureInfo.InvariantCulture))
      language = "vbscript";
    return UnpackScript(scriptName, language);

  public static string UnpackScript(string scriptName, string scriptLanguage)
    return "<script language=\"Javascript\">"
      + Environment.NewLine
      + UnpackEmbeddedResourceToString("Resources.Scripts." + scriptName)
      + Environment.NewLine
      + "</script>";
  // Unpacks the embedded resource to string.
  static string UnpackEmbeddedResourceToString(string resourceName)
    Assembly executingAssembly = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly();
    Stream resourceStream = executingAssembly
      .GetManifestResourceStream(typeof(ScriptHelper), resourceName);
    using(StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(resourceStream, Encoding.ASCII))
      return reader.ReadToEnd();

You’ll be seeing this ScriptHelper class again when I highlight some controls you might find useful. If you’re already using ASP.NET 2.0 (aka Whidbey), there’s an even better way to handle client files.

UPDATE: I just realized I was using code from a StringHelper class I wrote. I updated that bit to inline the simple functionality.

comments edit

Well I didn’t get much of an on topic response to my question of whether readers would be bothered by ads in an RSS feed, but I did get into a nice chat about hosting at home verse with a service. Apparently Robb Allen has enough computers at home to supply a third-world country. Think about it Robb? They can really use it. ;)

But it appears that a general backlash is brewing against the idea. It’s the battle between the Utopian view of RSS and market pressures. Personally, if a feed is interesting enough to me, I’d be happy to tolerate ads as long as the ads weren’t too distracting or garish. For small fries like me, it’s a nice way to supplement the income, especially as one who has recently made the jump to be independent.

Having said that, it’s almost always a bad move to alienate readers (unless your taking a principled stance on an important issue you believe in). The best choice (for me at least) is to offer a choice (paper or plastic?). I’ll probably keep my main feed ad free, but add a separate (but equal) rss feed that would contain an occasional ad. At that point I’ll cajole, grovel, and beg subscribers to switch to the feed with ads to help a brotha out.

comments edit

Orange Chicken In my comments, Barrywinces at the relevance of some Ad Sense ads he sees.

For the most part, I’ve been quite impressed by AdSense relevancy. For a while now, I’ve had nice colorful Family Guy ads on my home page. When I wrote about my Orange Chicken incident, a commenter pointed out that I hilariously had ads for Orange Chicken on my blog.

But ad-sense can backfire as well. I had one post where I was critical of the Republican party and I noticed that Google was showing ads seeking fund raisers for the GOP. I laughed out loud and figured, hey, that’s a good way to keep my blog balanced. Everytime I criticize the Republican party, my ads will balance that by advertising for them. I’ll criticize the ineffective Democrats as well so that this post gets ads for Libertarians or the Green party.

UPDATE: Looks like Rory’s noticing how eerily relevant AdSense can be.

comments edit

This past weekend Akumi and I headed over to the downtown flower mart to purchase some plants. We came home with a couple money trees and some bamboo for my office.


There’s something about Bamboo that is very soothing for me. Sometimes if I look at it long enough, I can swear that the leaves are moving gracefully, twisting upwards.

[Listening to: Undo - Björk - Vespertine (5:38)]

comments edit

As you’ve probably heard, Google is testing AdSense within RSS on a single site.

I love the idea of being able to include a Google AdSense ad within my RSS feed and watching the money roll in. At least in theory. Once ads proliferate in RSS feeds, ad-blockers within RSS aggregators will proliferate. Just look at this prototyped ad-blocker for RSS Bandit that Torsten developed.

Another issue that comes to mind is that the audience for web ads is not the same audience for rss feeds. I have a theory that those who find my site via a Google search are more likely to click on an ad than someone who is subscribed to my RSS feed?

Why is that? It boils down to the fact that a subscriber via RSS isn’t likely to be in the middle of a search for a particular piece of information while reading my blog as would a Google user. Rather, I suspect that he or she is a friend or a geek wondering if I’ll finally be inspired someday to write something worthwhile because I once wrote something interesting enough some time ago that encouraged this person to add me to his or her aggregator and now only inertia keeps this person from unsubscribing. But I digress.

Unfortunately, I don’t have any hard (or even soft) numbers to back this claim up because I don’t have ads in my RSS feed. Recently I was linked to on Scoble’s link blog which jumped up the number of aggregator views, while my web views remained constant. Likewise, my tiny advertising revenue for that day stayed constant as would be expected because those who read my blog via an aggregator aren’t likely to take their time to look at the actual site and click on an ad. I’d love to know what the effect would have been had my feed included an ad.

When I post something that users find via Google, my web views jump as does my advertising revenue, which makes perfect sense. I’ll be watching with interest to see how Google’s experiment with Longhorn blogs does and if they end up rolling it out to everyone. I’ll certainly experiment with it to see if my conjecture is correct unless I get a backlash from commenters saying they’d rather not see it in personal blogs. Thoughts?

As for my advertising revenue in case you were wondering, I’m strictly a small fry, though I do make more than enough to pay for hosting.

[Listening to: 3-2-1 Fire! - Fat Boy Slim - Fatboy Slim: Live On Brighton Beach (4:34)]

company culture comments edit

I saw this post on Don Park’s blog…

My perspective on this latest hot topic is that I think companies should act only in interest of itself, the Microsoft shareholders in this case, and not anyone else, including its employees. So I think the discussion should have been about whether leaders of Microsoft made the right decision in the interest of its shareholders.

I don’t understand this mode of thinking. Should people in general act purely on self interest and not for the common good? Why should corporations be any different? After all, they are made up of people, both shareholders and employees. It seems not all companies agree as Boeing, Nike, Coors, HP, and others supported the bill.

I suppose Microsoft would have continued to support the bill if it was rewritten to state that gays are not protected under anti-discrimination laws to own stocks in major corporations. Oh then you’d see some major rallying around gay rights.

I understand that having a corporation get behind a political cause is a touchy situation. Whose values do you support? Your employees? Your shareholders? America at large? But it’s clear that this bill supports values Microsoft already holds dear. Microsoft has in the past supported this bill and has shown itself to be progressive in its own policies.

And Ballmer’s worry of discriminating against anti-gay bigots is a real piece of work. Here’s a snippet.

What message does the company taking a position send to its employees who have strongly-held beliefs on the opposite side of the issue?

As Shelley eloquently points out, this bill doesn’t deny rights to others. And the message would have already been sent by the fact that Microsoft’s own policies are reflected in this bill. So if you’re worried about the bigots feelings Mr. Ballmer, are you going to change your policies to reflect that as well?

We’ve all seen what acting purely on corporate self-interest produces. Oh, Enron springs to mind, sweat shops, destruction of the environment, and countless other examples. Corporations have all the rights of a person without many of the implicit responsibilities. Corporations are members of the community. It’s time they start acting like it.

comments edit

UPDATE: Mea culpa! Maurice pointed out that (except for the casing) my original expression WAS correct. I only needed the RegexOptions.SingleLine option. I didn’t need to add the (\s|\n) everywhere. Here’s a corrected post. Thanks Maurice!

Last time I talked about matching HTML with regular expressions, I published a regular expression with a couple small bugs. The first bug was not my fault, but rather the fault of the rich text editor that comes with .TEXT. It was being overly “helpful” when I tried to edit the post and uppercased some of the code. As you know, “\S” is much different than “\s” to a regular expression.

The second bug is entirely my fault and I write this as a confession and to provide a fix. You see, I assumed (and you know what happens when we assume) that complete tags tend to be on a single line. Well that’s not the always the case. You might encounter something ugly like this:

<div     id = "blah" alt=" man    this is ugly html "     >     fire this guy... </div> 

The expression I had posted wouldn’t have matched the div tag sitting in plain sight there so I went in there and corrected that sucker all by itself. It requires using the RegexOptions.SingleLine option so that the . character matches \n. Here’s the expression reprinted (with correct casing) for your reference.

</?\w+((\s+\w+(\s*=\s*(?:”.*?” ’.*?’ [\^’”>\s]+))?)+\s* \s*)/?>

The main difference is now I’m including \n anywhere I’m matching whitespace (via \s). In order for this to work, you need to use the RegexOption SingleLine. Here’s a code snippet that uses this expression to match the above html.

string html = “<div\n\tid=\“blah\” alt=\” man\n”

    + “\tthis is ugly html \”\n”

    + “\t>”

    + “fire this guy…\n”

    + “</div>”;


Regex regex = new Regex(@”</?\w+((\s+\w+(\s*=\s*(?:””.*?””|’.*?’|[\^’””>\s]+))?)+\s*|\s*)/?>”, RegexOptions.Singleline);


MatchCollection matches = regex.Matches(html);

Console.WriteLine(“…..Original Html……”);

Console.WriteLine(html + Environment.NewLine);

Console.WriteLine(“…..Each Tag……”);

foreach(Match match in matches)


    Console.WriteLine(“TAG: “ + match.Value.Replace(“\n”, “ “));


This produces the output:

.....Original Html......<div    id="blah" alt=" man   this is ugly html "   >fire this guy...</div>.....Each Tag......TAG: <div     id="blah" alt=" man     this is ugly html "     >TAG: </div>

So sorry about that. Hope this one treats you better.

tech comments edit

I’m chatting with my buddy Micah who will ask me a question and then annoyingly answer it himself immediately after. For example, he asked me how FireFox picks up an icon from web pages. I replied that there’s a favicon protocol but that I didn’t know the details. He then proceeded to explain how to format the link tag properly.

Apparently the latest version of Trillian will highlight words with links to their definition in Wikipedia. So as you chat with your friends, you become a living breathing dictionary. That’s a rather nice feature for IM conversations.

comments edit

Yesterday I wrote about a neat Trillianfeature that highlights words with their Wikipedia definition.

Today Dimitri told me via MSN Messenger that I caused him to buy some music online. While I was out for a walk, I had left my iTunes playing. I’m using the new 7.0 version of MSN Messenger which allows you to automatically publish what you are currently playing as your status message. Apparently something I was listening to (as I have fantastic taste in music) caught his attention enough that he clicked on the song and bought it.

You have to love these small details that make software more interesting to use. Trillian’s wikipedia integration puts knowledge at your fingertips (to use a much bandied about Microsoft phrase), while Messenger connects us via the universal language of music. I love checking Messenger to see what people are playing at any given moment.

So Dare (currently playing something by, whoelse?, 50 cent), much kudos to you and your team on the latest messenger as well as for helping unleash the inner consumer whore within each of us. :)

[Listening to: Athena - Tiësto - Parade of the Athletes (6:17)]

comments edit

CancunPlanning a vacation is proving to be a challenge now that I’m independent. Last year, Akumi and I decided that we were going to England for two weeks this April. Well April has come and is about to go, and we’re no closer to Jolly old England (and Old Trafford).

With my project ramping up, I just don’t think we can do two weeks of vacation in a row. Of course, this isn’t really fair to my wife as I’m still going to Burning Man at the end of August. We need a shorter vacation for the two of us, so I thought of our good neighbors next door. Mexico!

Having surveyed her Mexican expatriate coworkers, my wife reported that they unanimously declare Cancun as the place to go. Armed with that information, we nearly jumped on an all-inclusive deal that would have us flying out of Los Angeles this Saturday. But good sense (or something resembling it) took hold and we stopped ourselves (for the moment).

I’m skeptical of all-inclusive deals because of the simple fact that once they have you there, they don’t have much incentive to step up the quality of food. Imagine travelling all the way to Mexico for bad Mexican food. ¡Aye Carumba!

So now we’re looking at November as a good time to enjoy the turquoise beaches of Cancun and Tulum. However, if you’ve been there and had a great time (or not), I’d love to hear about it. ¡Muchas Gracias!

[Listening to: Dreaming (Percussion Mix) “Vamos a Jugar en el Sol!” - Ruff Driverz Pres. Arrola - Trance: A State of Altered Consciousness (5:25)]

comments edit

One thing I’ve found annoying at times with the DataGrid control is there’s no way to specify a title to be displayed above the headers. Being lazy, I often resorted to adding a label above the data grid followed by a br tag.

But no longer! I wanted to have the title display in its own row within the data grid structure so I created a custom data grid control that does just that. See the example below for how it renders.

This is the Title
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3
See Spot Run
Run Spot Run!
Flee the Maniacs

The key to this is to override the OnItemCreated method and set my own rendering method for the header item.

/// <summary>
/// Assigns our own render method for the header item.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="e"> E. </param>
protected override void OnItemCreated(DataGridItemEventArgs e)
    if (ListItemType.Header == e.Item.ItemType && Title != null &&
Title.Length > 0)
        e.Item.SetRenderMethodDelegate( new RenderMethod(RenderTitle));
        base .OnItemCreated(e);

When ASP.NET is ready to render the Header, it’ll call my method instead which is named RenderTitle.

/// <summary>
/// Renders the title as its own row.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="writer"> Writer. </param>
/// <param name="ctl"> CTL. </param>
protected virtual void RenderTitle(HtmlTextWriter writer, Control ctl)
    // TR is on the stack writer's stack at this point...

    writer.AddAttribute("align", "center");
    writer.RenderEndTag(); // Writes </TD>
    writer.RenderEndTag(); // Writes </TR>

    // Now we add the header attributes we
    // copied.
    this .HeaderStyle.AddAttributesToRender(writer);

    //Render the cells for the header row.
    foreach (Control control in ctl.Controls)

    // We don't need to write the </TR>.
    // The grid will do that for us.

The snippet shown here will style the title row the same as the header style. In my actual control, I defined a property named TitleCssClass to enable you to define your own Css class to use to style the title row. This required me to do a bit of hacking so that the HeaderStyle gets removed from the render stack and then gets added back later when rendering the Header row. If that makes no sense, you’ll see what I mean. I’ve put the code for the control here.

comments edit

Elbow Yesterday Akumi pointed at my elbow in shock and asked me what happened.

“What happened to what?” I replied?

“You’re elbow. It’s badly bruised.”

Sure enough my entire elbow is covered in a dark shade of reddish purple. “Huh. How about that. I have no idea.” I did go to a party the night before, but I’m pretty sure I managed to stay on my feet the entire night. I don’t remember getting injured during soccer. It just showed up.

I’ll be sure to install a web-cam in the bedroom tonight. I have a sneaking suspicion that Akumi beats me while I sleep. If she does, it’s probably well deserved as I’ve been known to elbow her in the head while we sleep from time to time…. Hmmm. I better check her head.

comments edit

Since I mentioned that the Family Guy was no longer cancelled on my blog, I’ve noticed that Google Ad Sense has been displaying a Family Guy banner ad on my homepage.

Family Guy In case it is gone by the time you read this, the image at left is a snippet from the full banner ad. It’s colorful and looks rather nice at the top of my blog.

Now I agree that it’s a bad idea to try to game the google AdSense system for profit, but what about gaming the system for pure fun? For example, coaxing the Google Ad-Sense system to display the most interesting (or offensive) ad possible.

Well I won’t condone such behavior lest I’m removed from the program. I will merely mention the idea.